[removed]LOS ANGELES V. PATEL DECISION BELOW: 738 F.3d 1058 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: I.

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]CHAMBER OF COMMERCE V. BROWN DECISION BELOW: 463 F3d 1076 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed], [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Is the State of California’s regulation of noncoercive employer speech about union organi

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]RIEGEL V. MEDTRONIC, INC. DECISION BELOW: 451 F3d 104 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether the express preemption provision of the Medical Device Amendments to the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]BD. OF ED. OF CITY OF NEW YORK V. TOM F. DECISION BELOW: 193 Fed. Appx. 26 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Does the holding of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, statin

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]AT&T CORP. V. HULTEEN DECISION BELOW: 498 F3d 4001 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Before the passage of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of[removed]PDA), it was lawful to award less service cr

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]ZIVOTOFSKY V. KERRY DECISION BELOW: 725 F.3d 197 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether a federal statute that directs the Secretary of State, on request, to record the

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]WARGER V. SHAUERS DECISION BELOW: 721 F.3d 606 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) permits a party moving for a new trial based

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]NEW YORK BOARD OF ELECTIONS V. TORRES DECISION BELOW: 462 F3d 161 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]cv QUESTION PRESENTED: 1. In American Party of Texas v. White, 415 U.S[removed]), this Court held that it is “

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

• Elections
• Primary election
• Politics
• Government
• Voting systems
• Ballot access
• Election law

[removed]UNITED STATES V. SANTOS DECISION BELOW: 461 F.3d 886 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed], [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: The principal federal money laundering statute, 18 U.S.C[removed]a)(1), makes it a crime to engage

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

[removed]GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL V. UNITED STATES DECISION BELOW: 528 F.3d 292 LOWER COURT CASE NUMBER: [removed]QUESTION PRESENTED: Whether an audit and investigation performed by a State or its political subdivision constitute

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov